@if and @section issues

[naquad]

Using master, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3 (2010 Aug 15, compiled Oct 26 2012 16:45:16)
Included patches: 1-54 I see that @if content is not treated as PHP code and @section, @parent and @yield are completely ignored. Tried different color schemes, but result is the same. See attachment.

[johnhamelink]

Hi @naquad,

I've been aware of this issue for a while (and I also suffer from this), but I've never gotten around to looking into it deeply. I'll have a go at fixing it for good tonight, or if you already have a fix feel free to submit a pull-request.

Cheers!
JH

[naquad]

I'm afraid I don't. I've tried to change region definition but no luck :(

2013/3/25 John Hamelink [email protected]

Hi @naquad https://github.com/naquad,

I've been aware of this issue for a while (and I also suffer from this),
but I've never gotten around to looking into it deeply. I'll have a go at
fixing it for good tonight, or if you already have a fix feel free to
submit a pull-request.

Cheers!
JH

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/1#issuecomment-15397770
.

[johnhamelink]

Indeed, same issue for me. I've also tried building a regex using the very magic flag "\v", but what constitutes as a match in vim's search mode doesn't seem to match up with the search functionality available for syntax definitions.

I'll have another attempt tonight regardless. Thanks for reminding me about this ^_^

JH

[johnhamelink]

So I've managed to fix the @if syntax, but I've had no luck with the custom keywords. You can see what I've done here: ec74aa8

[naquad]

yes, @if is fixed, but @parent, @yield and @section are not :( i'm reading
vim syntax manual, maybe will make up something

2013/3/26 John Hamelink [email protected]

So I've managed to fix the @if https://github.com/if syntax, but I've
had no luck with the custom keywords. You can see what I've done here:
ec74aa8ec74aa8

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/1#issuecomment-15461693
.

[johnhamelink]

Indeed. I had a play with the syntax keyword command, but it just doesn't seem match for some reason (I think it might have something to do with the @ sign).