Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 22, 2022. It is now read-only.

No feedback upon missing/required subcommand #2

Open
odiferousmint opened this issue Feb 3, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

No feedback upon missing/required subcommand #2

odiferousmint opened this issue Feb 3, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@odiferousmint
Copy link

If you run pijul key, it does not print anything. I think it should print that a subcommand is missing and required. Related to this, https://pijul.org/manual/signing_patches.html is outdated. It uses subcommand keys, as in pijul keys --generate-signing, whereas it is actually key. With the latest version, that would be pijul key gen --signing.

The naming convention is kind of odd to me as well. For example:

pijul [SUBCOMMAND], AND pijul key [SUBCOMMAND]. Wouldn't it be better to use COMMAND for everything that isn't actually a subcommand? Let me know what you think.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant