Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why do you work with Commands rather than messages #5

Open
simonh1000 opened this issue Aug 22, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Why do you work with Commands rather than messages #5

simonh1000 opened this issue Aug 22, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@simonh1000
Copy link

This is just a question. I'm using your library at present in a widget that does not generate effects, but rather passes a message up, so what I really need is debounced messages. So for the moment I have use your library to create commands using Task.succeed. I am looking at the alternatives, but wanted to enquire about your design choices

@MartinSStewart
Copy link

I have a similar problem where I'd like to both return a command and modify the model. Thanks for the Task.succeed idea @simonh1000 I'll probably go with that as a short term solution.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants