Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Starting a Community Database of Grinder particle size distributions #4

Open
darkamgine opened this issue Jan 25, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@darkamgine
Copy link

While I think this is an awesome tool, the real value would be in gathering and aggregating as much of this sort of data together as a community. If we are able to share all our grind distributions from all of our own grinders and compare them to each other, then we would be able to use the data to answer some often asked questions such as:

Is grinder X comparable or better than grinder Y?
Is it true that beans from origin A produce more fines than those from origin B?
What effect does the roast level, days past roast, etc. have on the grind quality?

I created a sample repo with my own data, but it would be better if you can approve/administrate this project with your wider reach and influence.

https://github.com/Coffee-Grind-Distribution/coffee-grind-distribution

@flowreaction
Copy link

I like this idea. I would think this would be a pretty nice web application, where anyone can upload a photo of their grindsize, and safe the results. This would make it a much easier to use application for people not familiar with python.

@martin-arusalu
Copy link

Since this is not and will not be a mobile app, have you thought about converting this into a public / moderated API? Then when combining the database idea here I could create a mobile app and link this to your API. And in exchange for using your functionality you could get and store all the data + stats (as the OP suggested).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants