Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support socks5 proxying #2

Open
michaelitni opened this issue Jul 20, 2019 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #19
Open

Support socks5 proxying #2

michaelitni opened this issue Jul 20, 2019 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #19
Labels
enhancement New functionality slated to be implemented someday

Comments

@michaelitni
Copy link

how can I use a socks5 with the proxy command

example
127.0.0.1:1080

@jetmore
Copy link
Owner

jetmore commented Jul 20, 2019

Swaks doesn't support socks proxies yet. The only proxy it supports is the PROXY protocol. It's definitely on the list to explore, I'll leave this open as a wishlist item.

Thanks for opening a github issue, BTW. I was just toying with using them for issue management two days ago, this will be a good experiment.

@jetmore jetmore added the enhancement New functionality slated to be implemented someday label Jul 20, 2019
@jd-carroll
Copy link

@jetmore - if you publish the code here, it could also be a community developed feature. Thanks for the great utility!

@jetmore
Copy link
Owner

jetmore commented Oct 6, 2019

Also requested by devio.us#jirib 2012-01-04:

I've been looking for a smtp client which could work via
socks (helpful with Tor). As I haven't found any such client,
I've found 'socat' contains a script which could then talk
to a remote SMTP server with help of 'socat'.

As script is not fully OK for me, I have found `swanks', as
probably only smtp client being able to talk to a SMTP
server via pipes/sockets ;)

If I could raise a feature request I would vote for
a "native" socks/http proxy support.

@jetmore jetmore changed the title how can I use a socks5 with the proxy command Support socks5 proxying Oct 6, 2019
@jetmore jetmore linked a pull request Nov 27, 2020 that will close this issue
@jetmore jetmore removed a link to a pull request Nov 27, 2020
@jetmore
Copy link
Owner

jetmore commented Nov 27, 2020

See PR #19 for example implementation

@jetmore jetmore linked a pull request Nov 27, 2020 that will close this issue
@jetmore jetmore added this to the backlog-feature milestone Nov 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New functionality slated to be implemented someday
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants