-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Local tree around the emergence of Delta #313
Comments
Since the sampling is quite thin before March 1st, we can probably relax the filter on hets for that part of the ARG. We can impose the het = 0 filter on the samples onwards. The early Delta and closely related sample crop up in March/April. |
|
What do you suggest so? I might run this over the weekend. |
Just noting that we don't have any good samples till March 2021 for Delta B.1.617.2. |
Linking this to jeromekelleher/sc2ts-paper#226 for xref and closing |
While looking at the earliest HMM group of samples attached in
long_arg_v7_clustloc-mrm_2-rw_10-mgs_10-2021-06-30.ts.tsz
(md5sum:6cde6e2c00624a505aa00063973368f2
), I noticed that the samples have a suspiciously high number of ambiguous characters (specifically K).Also, these samples have a mix of Viridian Pango labels:
B.1.617.2, n = 3
B.1.617, n = 2
B.1.617.1, n = 7
These samples may be making it harder to build a good local tree around the start of the Delta wave. By being strict on the number of ambiguous character (
Viridian_cons_het == 0
, ignoring '.'), we may be able to do better here.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: