You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hey, sorry I missed this note. Yeah, the Haxe typedef representation is really similar to the GQL type definition -- well, at least for simple-ish types. For example, if you enter this schema into the online demo:
It might not be difficult to convert by hand, or with a simple script.
Now, representing Haxe types in GQL introduces build complexity and more limited capabilities (in GQL than Haxe), so you need to have a reason to do it. e.g. some other part of your application wants those GQL definitions.
Using a lot of typedefs in code already. Would it be easy to convert typedef to a schema?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: