Janet 1.34.0
#1436
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
Thanks for all the hard work! Two questions:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
@bakpakin The absence of pre-built binaries for Linux is causing GitHub workflows that depend on action-janet-test to break. Could these be added back? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
What's Changed
module/expand-path
is wrong and confusing. #1370 by @sogaiu in Address #1370 #1373propagate
anddebug/stacktrace
. #1365) by @sogaiu in Tweak debug/stacktrace docstring (#1365) #1367propagate
anddebug/stacktrace
. #1365) by @sogaiu in Add to propagate docstring (#1365) #1392proc_get_status
compliant to OS documentation. by @llmII in Fix: makeproc_get_status
compliant to OS documentation. #1403each
macro improper behavior? #1400) by @sogaiu in Swap set / body order for each (#1400) #1402New Contributors
Full Changelog: v1.33.0...v1.34.0
This discussion was created from the release Janet 1.34.0.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions