You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
gurunrao
changed the title
EJB test dependant on JAX-RPC is pruned with Jakarta EE 9 CTS
EJB tests dependant on JAX-RPC is pruned with Jakarta EE 9 CTS
Jun 25, 2020
gurunrao
changed the title
EJB tests dependant on JAX-RPC is pruned with Jakarta EE 9 CTS
EJB tests dependant on JAX-RPC, have been pruned in Jakarta EE 9 CTS
Jun 25, 2020
How can we generate these assertion_ids from the current spec document and validate if all these references have actually been removed from spec and javadoc?
EJB tests dependant on JAXRPC have been prunned with Jakarta EE 9 CTS.
Source for the tests can be found at https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/tree/8.0.2/src/com/sun/ts/tests/ejb/ee/webservices/allowedmethodstest
Details of the tests are as follows:
1)testName: wsbmAllowedMethodsTest1
package: com.sun.ts.tests.ejb.ee.webservices.allowedmethodstest.bm
assertion_ids: EJB:SPEC:121; EJB:SPEC:121.1; EJB:SPEC:121.2;EJB:SPEC:121.3; EJB:SPEC:121.4; EJB:SPEC:121.5; EJB:SPEC:121.6;EJB:SPEC:121.7; EJB:SPEC:121.10; EJB:SPEC:121.11; EJB:SPEC:121.12;EJB:SPEC:121.13; EJB:SPEC:121.14;EJB:SPEC:121.15; EJB:SPEC:121.16;EJB:JAVADOC:172; EJB:SPEC:10; EJB:SPEC:7; EJB:SPEC:67
2)testName: wsbmAllowedMethodsTest2
package: com.sun.ts.tests.ejb.ee.webservices.allowedmethodstest.bm
assertion_ids: EJB:SPEC:121.2; EJB:SPEC:823
3)testName: wscmAllowedMethodsTest1
package: com.sun.ts.tests.ejb.ee.webservices.allowedmethodstest.cm
assertion_ids: EJB:SPEC:120; EJB:SPEC:120.1; EJB:SPEC:120.2;EJB:SPEC:120.3; EJB:SPEC:120.4; EJB:SPEC:120.5; EJB:SPEC:120.6;EJB:SPEC:120.7; EJB:SPEC:120.10; EJB:SPEC:120.11; EJB:SPEC:120.12;EJB:SPEC:120.13; EJB:SPEC:120.14; EJB:SPEC:120.15; EJB:SPEC:67;EJB:JAVADOC:172
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: