You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
from @danote
This is not an issue with isoreader, but rather an idea for a new functionality, which you may or may not consider worth the time. I was just thinking that it would be awesome if isoreader allowed the user to re-evaluate a dxf trace with new peak detection parameters. In my experience, changing the peak detection parameters in Isodat can have important effects on delta values, but it is cumbersome to re-evaluate whole datasets in isodat varying peak detect params. If isoreader could evaluate the peaks, it would be easy for the user to test a range of peak detect params and see what results in best data quality. I think a lot of people arbitrarily choose peak detect params just because it is hard to test them. This could help. Just a thought. I know you don't have time to re-write all of Isodat though.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
from @danote
This is not an issue with isoreader, but rather an idea for a new functionality, which you may or may not consider worth the time. I was just thinking that it would be awesome if isoreader allowed the user to re-evaluate a dxf trace with new peak detection parameters. In my experience, changing the peak detection parameters in Isodat can have important effects on delta values, but it is cumbersome to re-evaluate whole datasets in isodat varying peak detect params. If isoreader could evaluate the peaks, it would be easy for the user to test a range of peak detect params and see what results in best data quality. I think a lot of people arbitrarily choose peak detect params just because it is hard to test them. This could help. Just a thought. I know you don't have time to re-write all of Isodat though.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: