Add a .pdf preview

[daviddias]

To stop a lot of bike shedding, papers should be added in BibTex format in the papers.bib

💯 for the .bib references, but so that it is pleasant to go through the list, can we have a .pdf preview in the repo? It can be the IEEE or ACM template just with a page for references :)

👍 for creating this repo, it is now one of my favs ⭐

[RichardLitt]

I would say we shouldn't, because I don't want to get into any issues with copyright.

[daviddias]

.pdf preview of the references (like a document easy to skim through and see the titles), such like the reference list in the actual paper.

[RichardLitt]

That can still be copyrighted, if it comes from a paper. Or did you mean a .pdf preview of the .bib references that should be generated in this? That should be fine to do; when we get some!

[daviddias]

Or did you mean a .pdf preview of the .bib references that should be generated in this? That should be fine to do; when we get some!

that! :)

[RichardLitt]

Ok! Let's do that, when we get some. :)

[Kubuxu]

It might be a bit bigger but it could be a github pages page that would be generated from this repo on some CI (for example Travis), and pushed into the gh-pages repo.

Although it might be too much work to do for something small like this.

[jbenet]

I'd prefer it in markdown because PDFs can be annoying. I'm sure someone
has made bib -> md
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 9:54 AM Jakub Sztandera [email protected]
wrote:

It might be a bit bigger but it could be a github pages page that would be
generated from this repo on some CI (for example Travis), and pushed into
the gh-pages repo.

Although it might be too much work to do for something small like this.

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#1 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIcoWtBkHk6MT4-te2MU_ll_DLiN5rOks5qn78zgaJpZM4JZgg9
.

[RichardLitt]

No reason we can't have both pretty easily.

[tapaswenipathak]

Hi folks, doesn't look like a lot of effort required for the ticket, can I help, interested. Is the ticket for internal folks?

[Stebalien]

I'd skip this one.

• The requirements aren't well defined and nobody on this issue is likely to comment.
• The .bib file still doesn't include all the listed papers, 3 years later.
• PDF support in browsers has gotten pretty good.

[tapaswenipathak]

ok; now that I have added a comment, lemme know if you would find .bib file listing all papers of any use.

[Stebalien]

I'd just leave this repo as-is.