-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
How to deal with is
?
#64
Comments
The I guess there could be an |
Thanks for your reply. I ran into In short I believe it is something like this:
I've already rewrote my code where I don't need an "unproxy" but it seemed to be missing from the library. I thought Feel free to close this issue as I'm moving on. Just a bit of friendly feedback. :) |
@ionelmc I've encountered the same problem now. In brief I was trying to organize a fallback for cases when |
So do I need to do something in LOP about this? |
I have run in to the following:
I don't know that there is a way to proxy
is
(identity) but it would be nice to have a way to ensure the proxy is evaluated.Now I'm using:
But that looks a bit ugly? Any suggestions? Perhaps something in "utils.py" to force evaluation?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: