Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A missing USGS station #22

Closed
cheginit opened this issue Mar 5, 2022 · 9 comments
Closed

A missing USGS station #22

cheginit opened this issue Mar 5, 2022 · 9 comments

Comments

@cheginit
Copy link

cheginit commented Mar 5, 2022

The following USGS station is not indexed:

ID: 04127918
nhdplusv2 comid: 12206226
nhdplusv2 reachcode: 04070002000042

@cheginit
Copy link
Author

cheginit commented Mar 6, 2022

I found two other stations:

ID: 02084557
nhdplusv2 comid: 1967611
nhdplusv2 reachcode: 03020104000870

ID: 10172200
nhdplusv2 comid: 10389446
nhdplusv2 reachcode: 16020204000450

@dblodgett-usgs
Copy link
Member

Are you sure about those last two? I don't have time to dig into things (and I found a bug I need to fix) but it seems like they are not really in the vicinity of the gage. Maybe I'm not looking at things right.

@cheginit
Copy link
Author

cheginit commented Mar 7, 2022

These are the flowline-station distances in meters:
image

I used NLDI's position endpoint to get the nearest comid. The last two sound far from the stations.

@dblodgett-usgs
Copy link
Member

OK -- yeah, that's what I'm seeing.

So it seems like there just is no flowline for the two that are far away?

@cheginit
Copy link
Author

cheginit commented Mar 7, 2022

No, there's no nearby flowline in nhdplus mr, but there are in nhdplus hr:

image

image

@dblodgett-usgs
Copy link
Member

OK, re: the one you found missing, I found the issue. It was superseded by 04127917 -- but the record wasn't combined. In my source of network locations that is the highest quality, they dropped 04127918. I will bring these cases back in our next release of locations to the NLDI.

@dblodgett-usgs
Copy link
Member

Regarding the ones that are far from a medium res flowline -- I don't think we should put those into the NLDI as indexed gages. We don't currently have a hybrid approach though. I just opened internetofwater/nldi-crawler#126 to track the issue.

@dblodgett-usgs
Copy link
Member

FYI -- @cheginit the site that was the original source of this issue has been fixed. https://labs.waterdata.usgs.gov/api/nldi/linked-data/nwissite/USGS-04127918?f=json

@cheginit
Copy link
Author

That's great! Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants