Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dynamic and group workload #97

Closed
wants to merge 20 commits into from
Closed

dynamic and group workload #97

wants to merge 20 commits into from

Conversation

curryzjj
Copy link
Collaborator

@curryzjj curryzjj commented Apr 2, 2022

SL, OB: dynamic workload
TP: group transactions
GS: multiple states access ratio

curryzjj and others added 20 commits March 11, 2022 09:19
* unified the namespace, make it be consistent with terms in paper. todo: update scripts.

* update

* add scripts for system sensitivity study

* code clean

* updated countdown to atomic integer to fix the bug for DFS

* refactor data structures, operations are extending the same operation now.

* update\

* unified the namespace, make it be consistent with terms in paper. todo: update scripts.

* update

* add scripts for system sensitivity study

* code clean

* updated countdown to atomic integer to fix the bug for DFS

* refactor data structures, operations are extending the same operation now.

* update\

* code clean

* update experiment scripts

* unified the namespace, make it be consistent with terms in paper. todo: update scripts.

* update

* add scripts for system sensitivity study

* updated countdown to atomic integer to fix the bug for DFS

* refactor data structures, operations are extending the same operation now.

* update\

* code clean

* unified the namespace, make it be consistent with terms in paper. todo: update scripts.

* update

* add scripts for system sensitivity study

* updated countdown to atomic integer to fix the bug for DFS

* refactor data structures, operations are extending the same operation now.

* update\

* update experiment scripts

* solve conflict

Co-authored-by: Aqif Hamid <[email protected]>
@curryzjj curryzjj linked an issue Apr 2, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
@curryzjj curryzjj closed this Apr 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

T6.5 Dynamic Workload Generation
2 participants