You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Please make passing custom-properties consistent between create/update/patch operations.
Other synctl arguments within a consistent format, but the differing format for custom-properties results in difficulty when attempting to automate management of synthetic tests, especially when synctl is used in an automation framework.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
There are inconsistencies with configuring synthetic test
custom-properties
acrosscreate
/update
/patch
operations.When passing
custom properties
during creation of a synthetic test, these are to be specified indict
format:Ref,
synctl
docsThe source for this can be found here:
synthetic-synctl/synctl/cli.py
Lines 1200 to 1203 in 6d4d7de
However, when passing
custom properties
during an update of a synthetic test, properties are to be specified in amap
format:Ref, synctl docs.
The source for this can be found here:
synthetic-synctl/synctl/cli.py
Lines 3711 to 3720 in 6d4d7de
....additionally, when looking at the format for
patch
operations, these follow theupdate
path's format:The source for this can be found here:
synthetic-synctl/synctl/cli.py
Lines 4246 to 4259 in 6d4d7de
Ref, synctl docs
Please make passing
custom-properties
consistent betweencreate
/update
/patch
operations.Other
synctl
arguments within a consistent format, but the differing format forcustom-properties
results in difficulty when attempting to automate management of synthetic tests, especially whensynctl
is used in an automation framework.Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: