Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Better instrumentation of send_after and start_timer #23

Open
iliastsi opened this issue May 15, 2013 · 0 comments
Open

Better instrumentation of send_after and start_timer #23

iliastsi opened this issue May 15, 2013 · 0 comments

Comments

@iliastsi
Copy link
Owner

Right now rep_start_timer and rep_send_after send the message immediately.
This is wrong. Instead we have to create a new process and send the message from there (ensure the message can occur at any time).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@iliastsi