Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename ribbon from "iCubTech" to creo2urdf ? #101

Closed
traversaro opened this issue Jul 8, 2024 · 5 comments · Fixed by #108
Closed

Rename ribbon from "iCubTech" to creo2urdf ? #101

traversaro opened this issue Jul 8, 2024 · 5 comments · Fixed by #108
Assignees

Comments

@traversaro
Copy link
Member

While working with @DavideBarbone, I realized it is a bit confusing for non-IIT users for creo2urdf to understand why they need to navigate to the "iCubTech" ribbon to actually find the "creo2urdf" button. Could it make sense to rename the "iCubTech" ribbon to creo2urdf ?

@Nicogene
Copy link
Member

Nicogene commented Jul 8, 2024

You are right, maybe it is better to place it in the Tools ribbon as the Mathworks one

@mfussi66
Copy link
Member

mfussi66 commented Aug 9, 2024

I created a new ribbon file that addresses the issue. However, it seems impossible to "inject" the creo2urdf button in the Mathworks group, called TOOLKIT, so I did the following:

immagine

Let me know if it's ok.

The validation button can be removed as it's not used at the moment.

@traversaro
Copy link
Member Author

I like it! The only minor comment is that URDF is an acronym, so in general it does not make a lot of sense to capitalize it, so I would either write URDF or urdf, while Urdf looks a bit strange (see for example how UDF Library is capitalized in the Utilities Menu).

@mfussi66
Copy link
Member

mfussi66 commented Aug 9, 2024

Coming right up:

immagine

@Nicogene
Copy link
Member

Fixed by #108

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants