“Mandatory” fields in MSR? (=> User Guide update?) #196
Unanswered
jhaasdyk-au
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
Thanks @jhaasdyk-au. Yes, clarification on mandatory fields should be added to the documentation. This can be accommodated in the next release. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
The purpose of this github discussion is to:
i.e. to inform additional user(self)-education, or potential enhancements or defects.
All findings and recommendations are my own and may not correctly represent current or planned DynAdjust behaviour.
PRIORITY: LOW
This discussion asks if DynAdjust Users Guide could/should clarify the following:
Why only for GNSS measurement, when all MSR types support the epoch field?
I would suggest an update to Section B.1.4 to clarify the above.
BACKGROUND:
All references below are to the DynAdjust Users Manual (Sept 2022) unless otherwise noted:
Section B.3.2 Measurement information (DynAdjust Markup Language (DynaML) format)
Section 3.2.7 Verification and error checking.
Section B.1.2 Header line
“The reference frame/geoid model and epoch/version fields [in the header line] are non–mandatory”
Section 3.3.1 Reference Frame
**IN PRACTICE:**
Section B.1.4 Measurement information (including subsections for each measurement type)
[Note: epoch can be (optionally) also provided in file header]
[Note: reference frame can be (optionally) also provided in file header]
It is also interesting to note:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions