-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
IPS downstream bmcweb commits merged upstream #3604
Comments
476e822eab has been Abandoned by ed. And ed used his commit (https://gerrit.openbmc.org/c/openbmc/bmcweb/+/48633) instead of mine. |
@gtmills @mzipse
|
Could you concentrate on the Power/Thermal commits? E.g.
|
Checking up on the focus we want to put on these 4 commits.... |
@mzipse |
Thank you. |
@lxwinspur https://github.com/ibm-openbmc/openbmc/tree/1050.00 is our 1050 branch. It has been rebased with upstream. |
Sure, I will rebase bmcweb and create PRs, Merry Chrismas :) |
Thank you! |
@mzipse FYI |
@gtmills @mzipse |
While I'm working to incorporate ibm-openbmc/bmcweb@168bbd6 into 1050, I found this is needed. 9fff1194c0 | Chicago Duan | Redfish : Implement LocationIndicatorActive for PCIeSlots | Merged upstream https://gerrit.openbmc.org/c/openbmc/bmcweb/+/42216 Could you take a look at it? |
@baemyung |
@lxwinspur @ChicagoDuan |
@lxwinspur Can you continue to pull more commits into 1050 this week? I added |
Yes, I will send more PRs into the 1050 branch this week. |
{ 9fff1194c0 Chicago Duan Redfish : Implement LocationIndicatorActive for PCIeSlots} also blocks to merge another one ibm-openbmc/bmcweb#363 to 1050. Thanks |
@lxwinspur @ChicagoDuan subscriptionType as well. I don't think it was part of https://github.com/ibm-openbmc/bmcweb/pull/498/files |
is a 1030 link, is that really already in 1050 ? |
is a link to a PR that didn't merge, did this indeed make it in ? |
It's my mistake. I pushed a new PR:ibm-openbmc/bmcweb#566 |
Done. Modified link. |
@lxwinspur Great work on the 1050. |
@gtmills |
Done |
@lxwinspur Can you please open https://gerrit.openbmc.org/c/openbmc/bmcweb/+/57765/ |
@lxwinspur Do you mind reopening https://gerrit.openbmc.org/c/openbmc/bmcweb/+/57765/ ? Thanks! Sure, I will address `merge conflict today |
@ChicagoDuan Can you reopen https://gerrit.openbmc.org/c/openbmc/bmcweb/+/42221, Thx |
@ChicagoDuan @lxwinspur Cores: Thermal metrics: Could IPS also help us by doing bmcweb reviews? |
@gtmills |
@lxwinspur Can you update the table at #3604 (comment) ? |
Sure |
Updated |
In September, we are going to rebase https://github.com/ibm-openbmc/bmcweb to upstream. Developers will be have to repull their commits if they aren't merged upstream, please try to get as many downstream commits in upstream as possible.
https://gerrit.openbmc.org/q/project:openbmc/bmcweb+status:open+owner:inspur.com+
Or this is from our spreadsheet of downstream commits:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: