-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Also display comments/wiki edits #2
Comments
Totally agree (actually wanted to make something to do that - reviewing PRs, comments, triage, etc), but this is a good start since displaying all that data might get messy. The nice thing about it now is that it does one thing and that it's simple (and not much thought into the UI since it's mostly a single piece of text) |
Testing out showing the # of issues in #10 I'm not sure what api I can use to get the # of comments a user has made in a repo.. |
Doesn't look like theres a way to search comments in the API, so that would require a server and tracking data over time or taking advantage of https://www.githubarchive.org and in either case would be best done with a backend. I don't think there's a wiki api either actually. So doable, but would require some more work. |
Looks like the only way to track wiki events is to use github archive events or tracking the repo events. |
Could do something with https://bigquery.cloud.google.com/dataset/bigquery-public-data:github_repos?pli=1 but not sure |
Awesome project!! I love the idea.
Many people in open-source get frustrated that code contributions seem to be valued more highly than troubleshooting/documentation, and I agree with that frustration--sometimes the most important contributions are the ones that help others, not add more code.
It'd be great to reflect this in this tool! I'd love to see additional data, such as "issues created", "comments made on issues", and "wiki edits".
Also, it'd be awesome to have some sort of integration with other sites--for example, if a project uses an external bug tracker, it'd be neat to cross-reference the contributor's activity on that site. Not sure how feasible this would be to implement, though.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: