Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improvement #54

Closed
7 tasks done
ericpre opened this issue Jan 13, 2024 · 12 comments
Closed
7 tasks done

Improvement #54

ericpre opened this issue Jan 13, 2024 · 12 comments

Comments

@ericpre
Copy link
Member

ericpre commented Jan 13, 2024

Follow up of #50 regarding potential improvement:

From #50 (comment):

From #50 (comment):

From #50 (comment):

@jlaehne
Copy link
Contributor

jlaehne commented Jan 23, 2024

Should we add ParticleSpy to the ecosystem? Not a full extension, but depends on HyperSpy.

@CSSFrancis
Copy link
Member

@jlaehne yea I would add it! It doesn't have a logo but you could probably just use the diamond logo.

@jlaehne
Copy link
Contributor

jlaehne commented Jan 23, 2024

@jlaehne yea I would add it! It doesn't have a logo but you could probably just use the diamond logo.

I'll add it to #57, @TomSlater do you want to create a Logo for ParticleSpy for nicer representation on the HyperSpy website?

@TomSlater
Copy link

@jlaehne Yes, I should have done it some time ago! Let me see what I can come up with.

@jlaehne
Copy link
Contributor

jlaehne commented Jan 27, 2024

Fationdo is using the more privacy friendly Plausible statistics described also under the above link:
https://plausible.io/fatiando.org

Apparently, one could even self-host a server with scientific-python.org

@ericpre
Copy link
Member Author

ericpre commented Jan 27, 2024

Apparently, one could even self-host a server with scientific-python.org

This would be good but I couldn't find any information on how to do that. For context, plausible doesn't have a free for open source pricing option.

@jlaehne
Copy link
Contributor

jlaehne commented Jan 27, 2024

I only found the explanation on the site you linked that one should contact scientific-python developers:
https://pydata-sphinx-theme.readthedocs.io/en/stable/user_guide/analytics.html

@jlaehne
Copy link
Contributor

jlaehne commented Mar 16, 2024

With the website now in a decent shape, I would submit a PR to add HyperSpy to the Scientific Domain listing on https://numpy.org

From the current categories, HyperSpy would fit either in "Signal Processing" or "Image Processing" I would say. In contrast to geosciences, chemistry and astronomy, there is no category on material science, electron microscopy or the like ... but anyway we want to be more domain agnostic now. I have a slight tendency to add it to "Signal Processing". Any opinions @ericpre @CSSFrancis ?

@ericpre
Copy link
Member Author

ericpre commented Mar 16, 2024

Yes, there and possibly in the array tab too, in the same way as xarray is listed there.

@jlaehne
Copy link
Contributor

jlaehne commented Mar 16, 2024

Yes, there and possibly in the array tab too, in the same way as xarray is listed there.

See preview at https://deploy-preview-736--numpy-org.netlify.app/

@jlaehne
Copy link
Contributor

jlaehne commented Mar 18, 2024

Other PRs to list HyperSpy on related project's sites:

Where else we could consider asking to be listed:

@ericpre
Copy link
Member Author

ericpre commented May 30, 2024

Closing as everything has been completed.

@ericpre ericpre closed this as completed May 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants