-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Entityunit tries to use field names as property names #4
Comments
I noticed that entityunit also had trouble finding the specified values for constructor parameters when first building the entity. Since every JPA entity or JavaBean should have a zero-param constructor, it's probably safer to use it and then fill in all the fields/properties (since they have names; constructor parameters generally haven't, unless you use |
seanf
added a commit
to zanata/zanata-platform
that referenced
this issue
Jan 21, 2017
seanf
added a commit
to zanata/zanata-platform
that referenced
this issue
Jan 21, 2017
seanf
added a commit
to zanata/zanata-platform
that referenced
this issue
Feb 14, 2017
seanf
added a commit
to zanata/zanata-platform
that referenced
this issue
Feb 14, 2017
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The method
BeanMaker.trySetValue()
callsBeanUtils.setProperty
if the JPA AccessType is PROPERTY, but it uses a field name instead of a property name. To make things worse, it seems thatorg.apache.commons.beanutils.BeanUtils.setProperty()
fails silently if the requested property doesn't exist. This leaves the entity property with its default value, instead of setting the requested value.This interacts badly with Kotlin's approach to interop for boolean properties - a Boolean Kotlin property named
isActive
will be exposed with the getterisActive()
and the settersetActive()
(thus the JavaBean property name isactive
), but the backing field is namedisActive
, notactive
. This is perfectly valid for JavaBeans, and would not be a problem, except that entityunit tries to access the JavaBean property (active
) using the field name (isActive
).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: