One repo per extension?

[annevk]

That would make it easier to watch and participate in just what is of interest to you.

[martinthomson]

(FWIW, I would prefer this too. Though closely-related stuff might be best kept together, I don't see much of that right now.)

[mnot]

@martinthomson's feelings are well-known, as are (probably) mine.

It's a pity you can't subscribe to a label, rather than just a whole repo. I do agree that as this repo gets more active, it becomes more difficult for casual or selective participation.

@mcmanus any thoughts?

[annevk]

I still think this would be good. Perhaps require it for new proposals as a start?

[ioggstream]

Imho having a single repo improves the overall coherence of the specs since people will even accidentally stumble upon things they can provide feedback on.