From 17123b3e984f2b9e270552014a69c6644a5615b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stijn De Weirdt Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 13:11:54 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Update mkdocs/docs/HPC/only/gent/2023/shinx.md Co-authored-by: Andy Georges --- mkdocs/docs/HPC/only/gent/2023/shinx.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mkdocs/docs/HPC/only/gent/2023/shinx.md b/mkdocs/docs/HPC/only/gent/2023/shinx.md index fbf5cfa802d..702a1abb0e1 100644 --- a/mkdocs/docs/HPC/only/gent/2023/shinx.md +++ b/mkdocs/docs/HPC/only/gent/2023/shinx.md @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ a `shinx` workernode, it is recommended to recompile the software to benefit fro The `shinx` cluster is significantly bigger than `swalot` and `victini` in number of cores, and number of cores per workernode, but not in number of workernodes. In particular, requesting all cores via `ppn=all` might be something to reconsider. -The amount of available memory per core is `1.9 GiB`, which is lower then the `swalot` ndoes which had `6.2 GiB` per core +The amount of available memory per core is `1.9 GiB`, which is lower then the `swalot` nodes which had `6.2 GiB` per core and the vicitini nodes that had `2.5 GiB` per core.