You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Personally, I'd use the exact same rule for SMT components.
I'm not sure if the THT rule is the best one here, though. While it apparently has it's reasons in the pick and place business, it is pretty inconvenient in my opinion.
Rotating parts is awkward.
Electromagnetical parts like pushbuttons, potentiometers come with a very logical choice for the footprint origin. Also, a well-placed origin would be very convenient for edge-aligned connectors.
The only discussion of the KiCAD people about this issue I found is this one. It doesn't go into much detail and I don't know much about pick and place, so it would be best if someone knew how much freedom in choosing the origin we actually have.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree with fruchtis sentiment. A centered rotational pivot is what I expect in all cases, except for parts like vertical potentiometers or jacks, where you want your origin to represent the center of the potentiometer axis or the plugged cable.
I cant really say what the deal is with pin 2 origins for pick and place tho
Currently, there is no rule where the origin of a package should be. For reference: KiCAD has the following rules:
Personally, I'd use the exact same rule for SMT components.
I'm not sure if the THT rule is the best one here, though. While it apparently has it's reasons in the pick and place business, it is pretty inconvenient in my opinion.
The only discussion of the KiCAD people about this issue I found is this one. It doesn't go into much detail and I don't know much about pick and place, so it would be best if someone knew how much freedom in choosing the origin we actually have.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: