You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Huh good question. Is it possible to do two values for one patient key in the dict? I think 2 convos for 676 only fails for specific groups of models (seq-2-seq and per-utterance MLM models) so we can set that up specifically?
Another simpler method I can think of is to just not assert the number of conversations, as in if the conversation does not fit the patient, print out something but still do the concatenation anyways.
Seems like we can do away with the num_convs check now that we are indexing. But in addition, we can perform a "merge test" on concatenated embeddings and the base df to ensure that all embeddings align with something in the base_df, and then we can print out a warning if conversations don't have embeddings.
@VeritasJoker How do you propose we handle this condition
247-pickling/scripts/tfsemb_concat.py
Line 30 in f36f764
if we go the route of https://github.com/hassonlab/247-pickling/blob/main/scripts/tfspkl_config.py#L11-L30
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: