Replies: 1 comment
-
The way you suggest still has bottle necks. What would probably be required, is that servers are aware of each others clients and subscriptions. Some kind of meta-data link between the servers would be required. Currently no plans are underway though. However, bridge mode is actually being worked on. That's not quite clustering, but at least provides some ability for sending messages other servers. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
While the architecture of FlashMQ scales well, I wonder what the path to clustering would look like. Is there an active server envisioned where publications end up, and slaves that take the (read-only) subscriptions? I think it can already be created by a client that subscribes on the active server, and publishes on slaves. Is there any design present for future clustering?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions