You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi! I am trying to apply causal forest to a panel data setting. I have two questions in bold.
Is there a way to modify the adaptive weighting function ($\alpha_i(x)$ from equation 2 of Athey et. al 2019) such that it varies by categorical attributes in the data? The reason is that since I'm interested in estimating the CATE for $Y_{i}$ (relative to the pre-treatment period $g$) in multiple time periods ($Y_{i, s} - Y_{i,g}, Y_{i, s+1} - Y_{g},...Y_{i, s+k} - Y_{g}$), and I want to ensure that when the CATE for $\delta_{s-g}(x)$, one of my parameters of interest is calculated, that only observations from where $t = s$, not $t = s+1$ have non-zero weights (according to the adaptive weighting function).
This is to ensure that when comparing the treatment and control, I'm only comparing observations with the same $t-g$ value.
Please let me know if anything is unclear! I had originally thought of using a separate causal forest for each $Y_{i, t} - Y_{i,g}$ for $t \in [s, \cdots, s+k]$ but since I want to cluster SEs at the individual level inference is difficult under that procedure. Is there a way to combine each iteration of a bootstrapped CATE from multiple forests (assuming bootstrap seeds are the same in all forests) for the purposes of inference?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi! I am trying to apply causal forest to a panel data setting. I have two questions in bold.
Is there a way to modify the adaptive weighting function ($\alpha_i(x)$ from equation 2 of Athey et. al 2019) such that it varies by categorical attributes in the data? The reason is that since I'm interested in estimating the CATE for $Y_{i}$ (relative to the pre-treatment period $g$ ) in multiple time periods ($Y_{i, s} - Y_{i,g}, Y_{i, s+1} - Y_{g},...Y_{i, s+k} - Y_{g}$ ), and I want to ensure that when the CATE for $\delta_{s-g}(x)$ , one of my parameters of interest is calculated, that only observations from where $t = s$ , not $t = s+1$ have non-zero weights (according to the adaptive weighting function).
This is to ensure that when comparing the treatment and control, I'm only comparing observations with the same$t-g$ value.
Please let me know if anything is unclear! I had originally thought of using a separate causal forest for each$Y_{i, t} - Y_{i,g}$ for $t \in [s, \cdots, s+k]$ but since I want to cluster SEs at the individual level inference is difficult under that procedure. Is there a way to combine each iteration of a bootstrapped CATE from multiple forests (assuming bootstrap seeds are the same in all forests) for the purposes of inference?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: