Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

For blockchains that have an execution and consensus layer client, automate JWT creation #115

Open
chriswessels opened this issue Aug 18, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

For blockchains that have an execution and consensus layer client, automate JWT creation #115

chriswessels opened this issue Aug 18, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
meta:good-first-issue Good for newcomers meta:triaged This issue has been triaged (has a good description, as well as labels for priority, size and type) p3 Low priority size:medium Medium type:feature New or enhanced functionality

Comments

@chriswessels
Copy link
Member

For blockchains like Ethereum, that typically have two clients and a JWT for authentication purposes, we currently require that either a literal value is passed, or an existing secret. For consensus layer charts, we could have an option where the JWT is generated and created as a secret, so that only the secret name must be passed in the dependent (execution layer) chart values.
@chriswessels chriswessels added type:feature New or enhanced functionality meta:good-first-issue Good for newcomers p3 Low priority labels Aug 18, 2023
@cjorge-graphops cjorge-graphops self-assigned this Oct 2, 2023
@cjorge-graphops cjorge-graphops added size:medium Medium meta:triaged This issue has been triaged (has a good description, as well as labels for priority, size and type) and removed meta:awaiting-triage labels Oct 30, 2023
@cjorge-graphops cjorge-graphops removed their assignment Jun 11, 2024
@cjorge-graphops cjorge-graphops assigned cwtaras and unassigned cwtaras Jul 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
meta:good-first-issue Good for newcomers meta:triaged This issue has been triaged (has a good description, as well as labels for priority, size and type) p3 Low priority size:medium Medium type:feature New or enhanced functionality
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@chriswessels @calinah @cwtaras @cjorge-graphops