From b8df7cf3f2363a73af39753c90ca88dd7e4d153d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Knut Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 16:06:04 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] doc: remove invalid encoding --- doc/cases.tex | 2 +- doc/turbulenceIntro.tex | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/cases.tex b/doc/cases.tex index db1dfb50c..20a5c271e 100644 --- a/doc/cases.tex +++ b/doc/cases.tex @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ \subsubsection{Turbulence under breaking surface waves}\label{breaking_waves} \sect{sec:updategrid}. If you want to compare the computed profiles with the analytical solutions in \eq{power_law}, you'll need a specification of the parameter $K$. This parameter is computed in {\tt -k\_bc()} to be found in {\tt turbulence.F90}, where you can add a few +k\_bc()} to be found in {\tt turbulence.F90}, where you can add a few FORTRAN lines to write it out. \subsubsection{Some entrainment scenarios}\label{entrainment} diff --git a/doc/turbulenceIntro.tex b/doc/turbulenceIntro.tex index c097fe187..b3b728024 100644 --- a/doc/turbulenceIntro.tex +++ b/doc/turbulenceIntro.tex @@ -1027,7 +1027,7 @@ \subsection{Numerics} l$-equation and the $\epsilon$-equation (described in \sect{sec:lengthscaleeq} and \sect{sec:dissipationeq}), $Q$ would be proportional to $q/l$ and $\epsilon -/kĻ$, repsectively. +/k$, respectively. A straight-forward, explicit discretisation in time of \eq{eq:burchard11} can be written as