Start points without end points in pickup&delivery problem

[CatonTheRoRo]

Is there a way to specify start points without end points, So the solver would not take endpoints as constrain in his solving process?
When I simply omit endpoints I got 'wrong number of arguments' error.
Is passing endpoints to RoutingIndexManager mandatory?
Is there a way or way-around to make or-tools run without endpoints?

[jmarca]

Can you give a code snippet example of how you are calling this? Guessing... If *all* of your pickups do not have delivery points, then you do not have a pickup and delivery problem. If just *some* of your pickups do not have delivery points, then those should be *excluded* from all of the code you use to specify the pdp pairs. ```py for item in items: if item.delivery == null: continue do_pdp_stuff(item) ``` Another idea...if all of the pickup without delivery items are supposed to be taken back to the depot, then you can create dummy delivery nodes for each item at the depot. Somethig like, in magical pseudo python: ```python # create needed dummy nodes prior to setting up the routing object for item in items: if item.delivery == null: # make a dummy node dummy_nodes += 1 item.delivery = dummy_nodes lookup_thing[dummy_nodes] = depot_node ... later ... for item in items: do_pdp_stuff(item) ``` James

…

On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 01:47:39PM -0700, CatonTheRoRo wrote: Is there a way to specify start points without end points, So the solver would not take endpoints as constrain in his solving process? When I simply omit endpoints I got 'wrong number of arguments' error. Is passing endpoints to RoutingIndexManager mandatory? Is there a way or way-around to make or-tools run without endpoints? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: #4405 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ***@***.***>

-- James E. Marca Activimetrics LLC

[CatonTheRoRo]

I use the example in or-tools page: https://github.com/google/or-tools/blob/stable/ortools/constraint_solver/samples/vrp_pickup_delivery.py
There is no depot, by 'start point', I mean the current driver start point:

data["pickups_deliveries"] = [
        [3, 4],
        [2, 5]
    ]
    data["num_vehicles"] = 2
    data["starts"] = [0, 1]
    data["ends"] = [0, 1]

The index manager function call:

manager = pywrapcp.RoutingIndexManager(
        len(data["distance_matrix"]), data["num_vehicles"], data["starts"], data["ends"]
    )

All pickups have deliveries, I was pointing to start and end points of drivers locations.
If I remove endpoints argument from the index manager:

manager = pywrapcp.RoutingIndexManager(
        len(data["distance_matrix"]), data["num_vehicles"], data["starts"]
    )

I get wrong number of arguments error.

[lperron]

The question of no end points has been answered multiple times.
Have you tried the suggestions ?

[CatonTheRoRo]

I am posting this after researching multiple times here and in other places. I did not find an answer that meets my needs. If you find one, please send me the link.

[lperron]

as indicated in this thread, you did not search hard https://groups.google.com/g/or-tools-discuss/c/tSM-f5GzWds There is even a guide entry for this: https://developers.google.com/optimization/routing/routing_tasks#allowing_arbitrary_start_and_end_locations Laurent Perron | Operations Research | ***@***.*** | (33) 1 42 68 53 00 Le jeu. 10 oct. 2024 à 14:14, CatonTheRoRo ***@***.***> a écrit :

…

I am posting this after researching multiple times here and in other places. I did not find an answer that meets my needs. If you find one, please send me the link. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#4405 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACUPL3PZBVMEOLD55KUHCB3Z2ZVRDAVCNFSM6AAAAABPVLK3S2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTAOJQGM2TOOA> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[CatonTheRoRo]

I had already found those before. I read them again and then spotted this phrase: '(and modify the solution printer to omit the depot).' OMG—my problem was already solved, but I got confused by the printed output. Anyway, thank you for your help.