You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am using aflplusplus and a custom afl++ fuzzer to do the experiment.
During fuzzbench experiment, afl++ will generate plot_data record: # relative_time, cycles_done, cur_item, corpus_count, pending_total, pending_favs, map_size, saved_crashes, saved_hangs, max_depth, execs_per_sec, total_execs, edges_found
Fuzzbench will use snapshot to evaluate the fuzzer performance recording: ,git_hash,experiment_filestore,experiment,fuzzer,benchmark,time_started,time_ended,trial_id,time,edges_covered,fuzzer_stats,crash_key,bugs_covered
And I found in the same experiment, edges_found is less than edges_covered. Any idea why?
Additionally, the edges_found in custom_aflpp is higher than edges_found in aflpp, but edges_covered in custom_aflpp is less than edges_found.
Here is the shortcut of raw data:
plot_data of custom_aflpp:
Relative Time
Cycles Done
Current Item
Corpus Count
Pending Total
Pending Favs
Map Size
Saved Crashes
Saved Hangs
Max Depth
Executions Per Second
Total Executions
Edges Found
50398
23
128
1699
232
0
27.35%
0
0
13
4849.04
304726213
1588
50403
23
107
1699
232
0
27.35%
0
0
13
5302.55
304753210
1588
50408
23
1036
1699
232
0
27.35%
0
0
13
5249.57
304779127
1588
50413
23
1093
1699
232
0
27.35%
0
0
13
5162.56
304807198
1588
50418
23
107
1699
232
0
27.35%
0
0
13
4887.70
304831321
1588
plot_data of aflpp_baseline:
Relative Time
Cycles Done
Current Item
Corpus Count
Pending Total
Pending Favs
Map Size
Saved Crashes
Saved Hangs
Max Depth
Executions Per Second
Total Executions
Edges Found
56686
611
1673
1913
16
0
26.73%
0
0
15
16005.00
896729564
1552
56691
611
821
1913
16
0
26.73%
0
0
15
15045.84
896808391
1552
56696
611
366
1913
16
0
26.73%
0
0
15
16217.05
896887749
1552
56701
611
1473
1913
16
0
26.73%
0
0
15
16599.39
896977824
1552
Edge covered of custom_aflpp:
Relative time
Trial_id
edge_covered
45900
28
1978
46800
28
1978
47700
28
1978
48600
28
1978
49500
28
1978
Edge covered of aflpp_baseline:
Relative time
Trial_id
edge_covered
54900
13
2000
55800
13
2000
56700
13
2000
57600
13
2000
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi all,
I am using aflplusplus and a custom afl++ fuzzer to do the experiment.
During fuzzbench experiment, afl++ will generate plot_data record:
# relative_time, cycles_done, cur_item, corpus_count, pending_total, pending_favs, map_size, saved_crashes, saved_hangs, max_depth, execs_per_sec, total_execs, edges_found
Fuzzbench will use snapshot to evaluate the fuzzer performance recording:
,git_hash,experiment_filestore,experiment,fuzzer,benchmark,time_started,time_ended,trial_id,time,edges_covered,fuzzer_stats,crash_key,bugs_covered
And I found in the same experiment, edges_found is less than edges_covered. Any idea why?
Additionally, the edges_found in custom_aflpp is higher than edges_found in aflpp, but edges_covered in custom_aflpp is less than edges_found.
Here is the shortcut of raw data:
plot_data of custom_aflpp:
plot_data of aflpp_baseline:
Edge covered of custom_aflpp:
Edge covered of aflpp_baseline:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: