Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fine-Tuning NeuralGCM with New Variables #136

Open
YohanAbeysinghe opened this issue Oct 28, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Fine-Tuning NeuralGCM with New Variables #136

YohanAbeysinghe opened this issue Oct 28, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@YohanAbeysinghe
Copy link

I’m interested in fine-tuning this model with an additional variable and would like to understand the feasibility of adapting the existing code for this purpose.

I noticed,

  • The current fine-tuning process in trained_models.ipynb updates approximately 1.4 million parameters for the 2.8 resolution model, which appears to cover the full set of model parameters.
  • But the fine-tuning currently relies solely on an L1 loss, unlike the full training code, which may incorporate other loss functions.
  • Integrating the new variable will likely require adjustments to the dynamic core.

Would the current fine-tuning implementation support this modification, or would it require significant code changes? Any guidance on how to approach this would be appreciated!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant