Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EPEL availability #54

Open
eclipseo opened this issue Jun 11, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

EPEL availability #54

eclipseo opened this issue Jun 11, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@eclipseo
Copy link

I've got asked to package a Golang app for EPEL, what are the plan for making the macros available in EPEL?

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Contributor

ingvagabund commented Jun 11, 2018

Partly blocked by https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409553. There are some golang packages already released as part of the RHEL7 that we can not update/build in epel7 due to packaging guidelines. Some of them:

  • golang-github-spf13-cobra
  • golang-github-spf13-pflag
  • golang-github-kr-pty

I am currently rebuilding go packages the apple the new macros and to upload automatically generated glide files. I will send an email describing the current state of the packaging and plans for the epel7 soon. Though, it may take some time.

Which Go app are you referring to?

@eclipseo
Copy link
Author

Rclone, which implies more than 130 deps.

@nim-nim
Copy link

nim-nim commented Nov 7, 2018

The plan is to eventually push to epel (I use my dev branch almost exclusively on el) but there are lots of cleanups and refactorings to finish first. Even within Fedora doing the changes is hard and gets some pushback. In EPEL it would not be possible at all to develop incrementally.

Not even sure where the golang package is in EL7 nowadays

@nim-nim
Copy link

nim-nim commented Dec 4, 2018

Issue migrated to https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants