-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Node upgrade / deprecation warnings #76
Comments
I am meeting this too. I see that the last commit in this repo is in Aug 2021. Is this action still maintained? |
I'm also seeing these warnings. Hope it'll be resolve. Node LTS is already on v18 👀 |
Any word on this? are there any plans to patch this action so it does not throw this Node 12 warning and eventually stop working? |
@idan , @Wattenberger , @mattrothenberg , Bueller... |
any news ? |
My project no longer runs as of today due to node 12 depreciation. Anyone know of an alternative to this or willing to make a fork? Edit on closer inspection it appears to be a problem with the deno package repo, but summer of depreciation is coming quite fast. |
Very frustrating abandonment and lack of communication here; it really makes me distrustful of other Github Next initiatives... @aslak01 Personally I switched to using an Azure data factory a while ago. I'm not a Node guy, but it might not be much work to roll my Python into an action with similar functionality. I can take a swing at it sometime in the next month if there's interest? |
@alecglen @aslak01 I totally hear your frustration. Sincere apologies for the delay on this front. I have a PR open that should hopefully fix this issue: #86. I'm by no means an actions expert, so can you try giving this PR a test by pinning the version of the action in your repo to |
Hi, thanks for your work on this. I have switched to using the action you suggested today. It fixes the issue reported here and also works fine for my use case. I 'll let it run (it runs on a schedule) for a couple of weeks and report back here. |
This should hopefully be fixed in https://github.com/githubocto/flat/releases/tag/3.4.0 🤞 |
Much appreciated, @mattrothenberg! I think this is working for me too, but there's something I'm missing. Hopefully the gang assembled here can help make it make sense? I haven't updated my my flat.yaml since the release, but I checked just now and the deprecation warnings are indeed gone as of a couple weeks ago. I'm confused because from what I can tell in the action logs, it's still running with an older version (3.3.1 based on the SHA).
However, the warnings are definitely gone, so I'm not sure what to believe 🤷 . Is there anything I need to do explicitly in the yaml to make sure I'm on the new release? |
@alecglen That sounds weird! Are you able to link to the particular action run where you're seeing that? |
Yeah I can ...it's just in a private repo that isn't actually top-secret haha. Just sent you a collaborator invite so you can view it. |
Great, will take a look tomorrow! |
Couple of weeks passed, not a single error for me. Many thanks again! |
Still getting this on |
@dalanmiller have you tried with |
Ahhhh wonderful that was it. I assumed incorrectly that using |
@dalanmiller no problem. Actually, that's what I also though, but apparently it was not the case. |
Getting these in the action summary:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: