Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix replacement suggestions for blacklist / whitelist #65

Closed
Nytelife26 opened this issue Apr 17, 2021 · 5 comments · Fixed by #73
Closed

Fix replacement suggestions for blacklist / whitelist #65

Nytelife26 opened this issue Apr 17, 2021 · 5 comments · Fixed by #73

Comments

@Nytelife26
Copy link

It is apparent that this project has fallen under an inconsiderate paradigm in regards to the replacement of "blacklist" / "whitelist" terminology. Replacements such as "allowlist" are not viable unfortunately.

This is not the only organization, of course, so no blame is on the developers. I am part of a group of people seeking to spread awareness on this :)

For more information, see:

Thank you in advance for your time.

@caitlinelfring
Copy link
Member

Thank you for bringing awareness to this topic! I didn't know about https://inclusivenaming.org/ and will look into it further and see how I can apply recommendations to woke.

@Nytelife26
Copy link
Author

Thank you for bringing awareness to this topic! I didn't know about https://inclusivenaming.org/ and will look into it further and see how I can apply recommendations to woke.

No worries, always happy to help. Our discussions have concluded mostly that "exclusion list" and "inclusion list" are better replacements, if that helps - however, it is largely contextual.

@Nytelife26
Copy link
Author

@caitlinelfring That doesn't really solve much. The point is that allowlist and blocklist are fundamentally poor choices, and create more harm than good. We should strive to use better alternatives where possible, and I don't think keeping around poor solutions is a good thing.

@caitlinelfring
Copy link
Member

I read through the conversations in the links you provided and I believe the change I made is sufficient. This seems like more of a general conversation that I would expect the community as a whole to resolve, not this specific tool.

I would also like to point you to our Contributing Guidelines, specifically:

This project is not the forum to determine what is inclusive language and what is insensitive language. Contributions should be limited to providing consumers of woke the ability to make their own decisions regarding conscious language.

Again, I appreciate you bringing this topic up, but until there is a concrete, widely-accepted solution, I don't believe there is much else to be done here at this point in time. Allowlist and denylist, while they may not be perfect alternatives, are not offensive.

@Nytelife26
Copy link
Author

Nytelife26 commented May 7, 2021 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants