You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Cells can have more than one polarity, e.g. epithelial cells have an apical-basal polarity and can also have planar cell polarity (PCP). We currently only support one polarity per cell, given by theta and phi.
One way to generalize our model is templating the functions in polarity.cuh:
However, PCP in epithelial cells is within the layer, so it would be better to come up with forces for cellular alignment in the plane orthogonal to the apical-basal polarities.
How many polarities do we actually need?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We should rather speak about tissue polarity instead of PCP in the context of mesenchymal cells. If one is interested in PCP, i.e. the polarization of epithelial cells within the plane one should indeed come up with forces for alignment within the plane, see #14.
Following the templating proposed in #15 , the methods used to modify cell polarity have been generalised, so they can be used independently on multiple sets of polarity vectors within the same cell. See relevant example: epithelia_double_polarity.cu
Cells can have more than one polarity, e.g. epithelial cells have an apical-basal polarity and can also have planar cell polarity (PCP). We currently only support one polarity per cell, given by
theta
andphi
.One way to generalize our model is templating the functions in
polarity.cuh
:However, PCP in epithelial cells is within the layer, so it would be better to come up with forces for cellular alignment in the plane orthogonal to the apical-basal polarities.
How many polarities do we actually need?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: