Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Need to add more generality over the examples for testing spot detectors #6

Open
vreuter opened this issue Mar 18, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@vreuter
Copy link
Contributor

vreuter commented Mar 18, 2024

The original transformation / preprocessing for DoG is what's parameterising the DoG detection function for the test_spot_detectors tests, but this should be randomised where possible (i.e., where there's no dependence of the expected output on the specific DoG transformation being applied).

@vreuter vreuter self-assigned this Mar 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant