Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add datahub into the chart #34

Open
edevosc2c opened this issue May 26, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Add datahub into the chart #34

edevosc2c opened this issue May 26, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@edevosc2c
Copy link
Member

The official docker projet for geOrchestra has datahub in its docker-compose: https://github.com/georchestra/docker/blob/master/docker-compose.yml#L229

If datahub is becoming a component of the geOrchestra stack, then we maybe should implement it into the helm chart?

We could have a dependency on the official datahub helm chart when it is out: https://github.com/orgs/geonetwork/discussions/7097

ping @fgravin @pmauduit @jeanmi151

@fvanderbiest
Copy link
Member

I'd rather have it as a dependency, because the datahub will be deployed outside geOrchestra too.

@fgravin
Copy link
Member

fgravin commented May 26, 2023

Yes, datahub should have its helm chart in the geonetwork organization repository. Hopefully, it could be used in Geocat directily as it is ?
Then, it would need some adaptation for the georchestra version maybe, because of the way the config.toml file is fetched.

@fgravin
Copy link
Member

fgravin commented Oct 20, 2023

The helm chart repo has been published in the GeoNetwork organization under https://github.com/geonetwork/geonetwork-helm-charts/tree/main/datahub

I think we should consider that the Datahub is part of geOrchestra, and move forward with its integration within the offical geOrchestra helm charts 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants