You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
#6500 indicates that this should be possible, but the options does not show up for me in a subset of cases and I'm wondering if this is an intentional decision, or something maybe overlooked.
"Upload data: collections", nametags are unavailable and it isn't clear why.
We can build collections of similar shapes from datasets which have name tags, however we can't do this immediately in the rule builder.
Additionally name tags don't seem to be rendered for elements of collections?
And lastly, when the name tag option does appear, it doesn't behave like the other tagging options? We can't pull tag values from multiple columns? Maybe this is contrary to the intended use of "name" tags but, it fits with the use in practice sometimes? If people want to abuse name tags in different ways, it might be nice to permit it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yeah, that would be good to allow uniformly, I think the reason for not having done this initially was that we didn't create a new HDA. Operating on the existing HDA would mean that you can accidentally tag "unrelated" datasets. But whenever we build a collection we should copy the HDA (I think we do that everywhere now), so we should allow setting tags as well (especially for group tags this would be very useful).
"Upload data: collections", nametags are unavailable and it isn't clear why.
Definitely still want this, I've got a history where I've done a dozen operations on two collections and cannot keep them straight, if I'd thought to tag the collections "#genes" or "#dna", it would be nicer now. (Yes I can do it manually but, I've already got a huge json blob for the uploader.)
#6500 indicates that this should be possible, but the options does not show up for me in a subset of cases and I'm wondering if this is an intentional decision, or something maybe overlooked.
Given the following URLs:
We can build collections of similar shapes from datasets which have name tags, however we can't do this immediately in the rule builder.
Additionally name tags don't seem to be rendered for elements of collections?
And lastly, when the name tag option does appear, it doesn't behave like the other tagging options? We can't pull tag values from multiple columns? Maybe this is contrary to the intended use of "name" tags but, it fits with the use in practice sometimes? If people want to abuse name tags in different ways, it might be nice to permit it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: