-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Validation and testing results are not good #18
Comments
If possible, could you elaborate more on the choice of "no_ndc"? Is it heavily dependent on the input format or just empirical? Thanks a lot! |
I am not able to get the results with the same quality as the paper either. |
Same here. Trained with person_1's data and config. Training psnr gradually reaches 32 while validation psnr plateaus at 20. Would really appreciate if author can help here! |
Hi!How did you get these charts? |
Hello, I have also encountered the same problem. Have you resolved it |
Hi,
Thanks for the great work and kind release of the implementation. I followed the modification in Issue#16 and could train the model with your default .yml file. However, the validation and testing results are not good visually (using ckpt at epoch 500k/600k/...). Most of them are blurry and some of them even only contains background. The training losses are decreasing, but the coarse loss of validation set is not. Could you please provide some suggestions about how to tune the parameters or fix the model training? Thanks a lot!
The validation results and loss curves from tensorboard snapshots are attached below:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: