You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello.
Thanks for the simulator allowing to evaluate on more complex anomaly scenarios!
I would like to reproduce the results which are reported with RbA.
How can I generate the exact same images, that you used for training and evaluation? Will I get it, when I run the simulator with your default Definitions.py ? This is not exactly clear to me.
Thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for your reply. I had a look. Can I assume that you used all images that contain an anomaly in the evaluation split and the rest for training split? If not, could you provide a list of the images used for the different splits?
Sorry, I don't have access to my work computer at the moment (on a research stay), so I'm only sure 90%. But I believe we took the whole legacy dataset for evaluation (also the frames without anomalies) and generated a new NORMALITY (Definitions.py) dataset in the size of the Cityscapes dataset that consists of 2,975 frames with CARLA towns 1-7,9,10, and the same weather settings as in the eval set.
Hello.
Thanks for the simulator allowing to evaluate on more complex anomaly scenarios!
I would like to reproduce the results which are reported with RbA.
How can I generate the exact same images, that you used for training and evaluation? Will I get it, when I run the simulator with your default Definitions.py ? This is not exactly clear to me.
Thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: