Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Soft deprecate .progress #138

Open
DavisVaughan opened this issue Jul 31, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Soft deprecate .progress #138

DavisVaughan opened this issue Jul 31, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
0.4.0 breaking change ☠️ API change likely to affect existing code

Comments

@DavisVaughan
Copy link
Collaborator

DavisVaughan commented Jul 31, 2020

Replace with progressr in some way. Either:

  • Internally use it with .progress = TRUE (not ideal)

  • Maybe progressr will have changed in such a way that with_progress(future_map(x, f)) isn't quite as clunky

  • Some other option?

@DavisVaughan DavisVaughan changed the title Hard deprecated .progress in furrr 0.3.0 Hard deprecate .progress in furrr 0.3.0 Jul 31, 2020
@DavisVaughan DavisVaughan changed the title Hard deprecate .progress in furrr 0.3.0 Hard deprecate .progress Aug 7, 2020
@DavisVaughan DavisVaughan added 0.4.0 breaking change ☠️ API change likely to affect existing code labels Aug 7, 2020
@DavisVaughan DavisVaughan changed the title Hard deprecate .progress Soft deprecate .progress Aug 14, 2020
@dpprdan
Copy link

dpprdan commented Mar 21, 2023

  • Some other option?

Replace with cli progress bars, to stay in sync with purrr?

@DavisVaughan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Likely some internal usage of progressr, possibly with a cli default, but yea now that purrr added the progress option back in I am inclined to keep it

@statzhero
Copy link

The purrr progress bar is one of my favorites, so I hope furrr can align it as much as possible. I appreciate all your work and was wondering what the plan to maintain furrr is?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
0.4.0 breaking change ☠️ API change likely to affect existing code
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants