-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 838
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ARM64 Installer for Windows 11 on ARM devices needed #4166
Comments
Is there anything new about Windows 11 ARM? |
I have Windows 11 Snapdragon X elite machine. I have in stalled C++ directly by itself ok. |
Which version of Windows 11 are you using? On Windows 11 24H2, Fritzing might run out of the box with Prism: |
We have updated the installer to a more recent version for Fritzing 1.0.4: https://fritzing.org/releases/1-0-4 |
I wonder if the issue is that there isn't a Microsoft Visual C++ 2015 Redistibutable (which I think is required by Fritzing and is installed if not present by the installer) available for Arm. I think the Arm port is fairly recent and they may not have done older versions for it. This is from Win 10 on Intel Checking the Microsoft site for what Visual C++ redistbutables (if any!) are available for Arm and installing one may fix the issue. I don';t know if Fritzing would use a later version or if it needs the 2015 version and won't accept a later one or not. |
Current Behaviour
The current Windows 64-bit installer for Fritzing is not compatible with Windows 11 on ARM devices. When trying to install Fritzing on a Surface Pro with ARM processor, the following error message appears:
Build:
1.03
Operating System:
Windows 11 on ARM (Surface Pro with ARM processor)
Steps to reproduce:
Expected Behaviour
An ARM64 version of the Fritzing installer should be available for Windows 11 on ARM devices, allowing for native installation without relying on x86 emulation.
Alternatively, if an ARM64 version is not feasible, clear instructions on how to run Fritzing on Windows 11 ARM devices or information about future plans for ARM64 support would be helpful.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: