This document assumes you have already set up a development environment and have made a change you want to submit for review. If you'd like an idea for something to start with:
- Is there anything you've found annoying or lacking while using Freenet that you'd like to fix? (There might even be a bug filed already.)
- The bug tracker has tasks. List only bugs filed against this repository by selecting "Freenet" in the "Project" drop-down in the upper right. Do any of these look interesting?
- Check the projects page.
- Ask the development mailing list
or join us in IRC -
#freenet
onchat.freenode.net
.
Once you have a change ready for review, please submit it as a pull
request
against the next
branch. It's usually a good idea to work on a topic / feature
branch that starts at next
and is specific to the pull request. Once you have
submitted a pull request, people will start reviewing it and providing feedback.
If you don't hear anything for a while feel free to bring it to the attention of
people in IRC or the mailing
list - we may
have missed it.
Code review helps improve code quality, ensures that multiple people know the codebase, serves as a defense against introducing malicious code, and makes it infeasible to pressure people into contributing malicious code. Its goal is producing software that is readable, correct, and sufficiently efficient.
Breaking API creates an immense amount of work for developers of other projects, so it is not something to be done lightly. If you feel you must make a change that breaks API and cannot maintain backwards compatibility, please first raise the issue with the community - the mailing list and IRC are good places to contact us.
Before submitting a pull request, please:
- add an entry to the NEWS file if appropriate
- ensure modified lines meet the project coding standards
- ensure the commit messages meet the standards:
The first line is the title:
- Write it as a command to the codebase
- Limit the length to 72 characters
- Do not put a period at the end
- (optional) Separate context with a colon
The second line is blank. If the message contains additional prose description on the third and subsequent lines, it is wrapped to 72 characters. Long lines that do not split well, such as URLs or stack traces, are an exception to this.
For example:
Update default bookmark editions
Additional description of what the change does, why it is a good idea,
and any alternate solutions that seem more obvious and were decided
against goes here. For some changes this might not be necessary.
For more discussion see the git patch submission documentation.
Text editors can be configured to assist in formatting messages this way, and git packages sometimes ship with such configuration.