Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Statutory and regulatory citations from the Indigo Book #48

Open
jcushman opened this issue Apr 27, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Statutory and regulatory citations from the Indigo Book #48

jcushman opened this issue Apr 27, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@jcushman
Copy link
Contributor

Related to #13 about adding law review abbreviations, what do you think of adding all of the non-case citation formats (statutes and regulations) from the Indigo Book's tables? (Or from another source if there's something easier to extract data from than that, though it doesn't look too bad.)

With the new regexes field and with eyecite where it is, I think there's some low hanging fruit at this point to expand what we're extracting. We could get fancy, but it could be as easy as adding some new "cite_type": "statute|law_review|..." values to reporters.json, dropping in regexes extracted from Indigo Book, and having eyecite inspect cite_type to emit StatuteCitation or RegulationCitation or LawReviewCitation instead of FullCaseCitation.

"reporters-db" starts to become a little inaccurate at this point, but not sure if that's really an issue ...

@jcushman
Copy link
Contributor Author

We've now added T1. Federal Judicial and Legislative Materials in #56, and T3. U.S. States and Other Jurisdictions in #51.

What's missing still is T2. Federal Administrative and Executive Materials. There's a lot of interesting stuff in there, but with so many edge cases I'm not yet picking it up for the moment. For example:

  • There's some stuff that wants to go in reporters.json, like "55 Agric Dec. 1121".
  • There's some stuff that wants to go in laws.json like "Treas. Reg. § 1.41-2 (1989)" and "3 C.F.R. 216" and "59 FR 9061".
  • There's some stuff that I'm not sure if it counts as citations or just docket numbers, like "ASBCA No. 43466, 93-1 BCA ¶ 25,508". (Should eyecite extract docket numbers?) Anything with <secondary source if available> probably falls into this category.
  • There's some specialty collections like trademark, patent, and copyright registrations that aren't exactly legal sources but would be interesting to include somewhere.

A lot of that is obviously important like C.F.R. and Fed. Reg.

In addition to T2, there are some other sections that still look valuable to mine for sources, with their own edge cases:

  • "T4.2. Service Abbreviations", like "Am. Stock Ex. Guide (CCH)", "Admin. L.3d (BNA)". We have some of these in reporters.json already.
  • "T6. Required Abbreviations for Treaty Sources", like "T.I.A.S. No. x", " U.S.T. xxx" ...
  • "T7. Required Abbreviations for Arbitral Reporters"
  • "T8.1. United Nations and League of Nations"
  • "T8.2. Europe" (not sure how much it makes sense to pull this thread, vs. non-European sources)

@bbernicker
Copy link
Contributor

I would be happy to take a stab at adding treaties (T6). Are people ok with them going in laws.json?

@bbernicker
Copy link
Contributor

bbernicker commented Aug 31, 2022

PR #121 adds treaties. I am planning to do arbitral reporters and state constitutions next.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: 📋 Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants