You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
"People v. Brislin, 80 Ill. 423; Lehmer v. The People, id. 601; Prout v. The People, 83 id. 154; C. & N. W. Ry. Co. v. The People, id. 467; Andrews v. The People, id. 529; Gage v. Parker, 103 id. 528; Blake v. The People, 109 id. 504; Riverside v. Howell, 113 id. 256; Schertz v. The People, 105 id. 27; Murphy v. The People, 120 id. 234; Riebling v. People, 145 id. 120."
It's used both with the same volume, like "id. 601" for "80 Ill. 601", and with different volumes, like "83 id. 154" for "83 Ill. 154".
(I don't have any great ideas about how to handle this and I'm not sure how common it is; just documenting.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We don't currently handle this citation format:
"People v. Brislin, 80 Ill. 423; Lehmer v. The People, id. 601; Prout v. The People, 83 id. 154; C. & N. W. Ry. Co. v. The People, id. 467; Andrews v. The People, id. 529; Gage v. Parker, 103 id. 528; Blake v. The People, 109 id. 504; Riverside v. Howell, 113 id. 256; Schertz v. The People, 105 id. 27; Murphy v. The People, 120 id. 234; Riebling v. People, 145 id. 120."
It's used both with the same volume, like "id. 601" for "80 Ill. 601", and with different volumes, like "83 id. 154" for "83 Ill. 154".
(I don't have any great ideas about how to handle this and I'm not sure how common it is; just documenting.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: