You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
"consider having an internal wire of the selected channel" but the solution has no such wire. Is there really a point in using a wire or can this hint be removed?
"PriorityMux(List[Bool, Bits]), which takes in a list of valid signals and bits, returning the first element that is valid" where I figured bits would refer to the bits from the decoupled interface. But I guess any data works, right? Maybe a more general term like data can be used? [reading it again it's clear that the Chisel bits type is meant so I don't know why I got on the wrong the track here]
the solution uses foreach which was not introduced in the chapter. Would a map work too?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
wunderabt
changed the title
Chapter 3.3 - excercise on decoupled arbiter is confusting
Chapter 3.3 - excercise on decoupled arbiter is confusing
May 30, 2021
The hints contained 3 points that confused me:
bits
would refer to thebits
from the decoupled interface. But I guess any data works, right? Maybe a more general term likedata
can be used? [reading it again it's clear that the Chiselbits
type is meant so I don't know why I got on the wrong the track here]foreach
which was not introduced in the chapter. Would amap
work too?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: