You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We should have a discussion about why we absolutely need to have fgGet and fefgGet. I know this seemed important to FP. It makes the code organization much harder to follow - why is there an fg and also an fg that is specialized to the fe context. If we can reorganize to eliminate the two types of fg gets, many good things will follow (IMO).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We should have a discussion about why we absolutely need to have fgGet and fefgGet. I know this seemed important to FP. It makes the code organization much harder to follow - why is there an fg and also an fg that is specialized to the fe context. If we can reorganize to eliminate the two types of fg gets, many good things will follow (IMO).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: