Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
It's not an issue, but a question related with general fluid mechanics. Please do not use this space for such purpose (there are certainly better places). Unless I am missing something, what you are getting is the expected behavior. Why should Cl = 0 for an offset cylinder in a Poiseuille flow? It can be << Cd, but not null, as there is loss of symmetry about the transverse direction. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Can you share a paper showing 'the expected results'? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Dear Fppimenta$\approx=10^{-14}$ ), it goes up to $\approx=10^{-4}$ , in the upper half part of the channel which is very similar to the results of the elastic case. Based on literature, this lift coefficient should remain null for a Stokes flow wherever the position in the y-axis.
I am interested in calculating the lift coefficient of a cylinder in a channel with a viscoelastic flow, depending on its y-position. I made some computations and got some results and to explain the results obtained, I then checked the Newtonian case for Re=0 (ok, I should have done this in first place !).
Unexpectedly, the lift coefficient for the Newtonian case doesn't remain null when moving the cylinder in the y direction. Even if at the center it is null (
I have doubled checked that the convective term is disabled in fvSchemes, tried multiple convergence test (in time, mesh, etc) and I am not able to figure out what is wrong.
Have you an idea ?
If you want to have a look, I set up a minimum working example here based on your tutorial:
https://cloud.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/index.php/s/drbj62AKBwZMNBx
Thanks a lot in advance for any suggestion you may have !
Guillaume
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions